Month: November 2016

Mark Zuckerberg:

After the election, many people are asking whether fake news contributed to the result, and what our responsibility is to prevent fake news from spreading. These are very important questions and I care deeply about getting them right. I want to do my best to explain what we know here.

Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99% of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes. The hoaxes that do exist are not limited to one partisan view, or even to politics. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.

This response is a dodge. What does “99% of what people see is authentic” mean, anyway? He’s not saying that 99% of the news that’s posted on Facebook is truthful or reputable, just that nearly everything is “authentic”. And even if it is true that just 1% of the posts are inauthentic, those posts may be shared thousands of times.

Mike Isaac, New York Times:

Even as Facebook has outwardly defended itself as a nonpartisan information source — Mr. Zuckerberg said at a conference on Thursday that Facebook affecting the election was “a pretty crazy idea” — many company executives and employees have been asking one another if, or how, they shaped the minds, opinions and votes of Americans.

[…]

Even in private, Mr. Zuckerberg has continued to resist the notion that Facebook can unduly affect how people think and behave. In a Facebook post circulated on Wednesday to a small group of his friends, which was obtained by The New York Times, Mr. Zuckerberg challenged the idea that Facebook had a direct effect on the way people voted.

Emily Bell, Columbia Journalism Review:

The line of argument that says we need better journalism to combat fake news is appealing. However, it conflates two different crises. Having a larger number of good journalists is an indisputable goal for any functioning democracy. Wiping out the malicious falsehoods that carpet swaths of the social Web should be a high priority too. But the former will not be an adequate antidote to the latter.

On any given day, far more journalism is produced by non-partisan media outlets than by the most popular partisan sites. It might be relentlessly mundane reporting, insufficiently serious, and poorly reflect complex policy arguments, but it is rarely fabricated or hoaxed—fewer than 1 percent of pieces published in mainstream outlets fell into Silverman’s “totally false” category. The problem is that even where there is accurate journalism, it is not seen or not believed, or both.

It strikes me that Facebook is simultaneously arguing to advertisers that its targeting is effective in swaying buyer decisions while also stating that what users see in their feeds cannot possibly effect an election. I don’t see how both of those can be true.

Jason Snell:

Four and a half years later, it’s still an open question. The laptop line still features a $999 non-Retina MacBook Air. Apple’s had a sub-$1000 starting price for Mac laptops for some time now, but the cheapest retina Mac is the $1299 MacBook. That’s a $300 divide. On the iMac front it’s a similar story—the two base models of the 21.5-inch iMac are non-Retina, starting at $1099 and $1299. The first Retina model is $1499, a $200 divide.

You can mentally insert iPad prices on the graphic Snell has put into this post: iPad Mini and iPad Air 2 starting at $399,1 the iPad Pro at $599, and the 12.9-inch Pro at $799. All include Retina displays that support at least 100% of the RGB colour gamut.

That means that Apple’s products have Retina displays at every $200 price point from $399 to $799, and then again from $1,299 through $2,399 (though there are two $300 gaps in there). But there is still that $500 gap between the least expensive iPad and the least expensive Retina Mac, and the same $500 split between the least expensive MacBook Air and the entry-level MacBook Pro — effectively, the Retina version of the Air.

What’s striking to me is that the MacBook and the previous-generation 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro both started at the same $1299 price point. The gap has been closed between the least-expensive model of the highest-end iPad, but that’s through the introduction of the iPad Pro, not the reduction of Mac prices. That makes a lot of sense when you consider the positioning of the iPad Pro in the trite cars-vs-trucks analogy, but it’s also notable that the $1299 price point is the lowest Apple either can’t or won’t break for a Retina Mac.


  1. The iPad Mini 2 is $269, but it is entirely outdated. I wouldn’t be surprised if iOS 11 doesn’t support it. ↥︎

In the wake of a forthcoming Donald Trump presidency, all-Republican Congress, and the likely nomination of a strongly-conservative judge in the vein of Antonin Scalia to the Supreme Court, it’s worth re-emphasizing a number of the concerns over privacy and data collection that have accumulated over the past several years. There are three areas of data collection that I’d like to focus on: user-provided data, user usage data, and scraped intelligence data.

User-provided data is the kind of information that we willingly provide on a regular basis to every service. Think about how many different websites have asked for your name or email address at some point, and you’ll get an idea of how much information you provide without necessarily noticing it. It’s become routine to tell a web service what your name is, where you’re from, how to contact you, what you look like, and who else you know. Because it’s so typical, many websites will ask for even more information, like where you went to school, where you work, how old you are, what your favourite music and TV shows are, and who you’re dating or married to. That’s a lot of information to be held by a single company, but consider all of the different companies that you might have given some or all of these data points.

Usage data is the data collection you typically don’t see firsthand, but will definitely notice. Every search you make, every post you like, every link you click, anything you linger on but don’t act upon, every advertisement that loads on your screen, and, increasingly, the other websites you visit — these are all tracked.

Combine both of those aspects of the collected data of a typical user and whichever company or entity has that data can get an accurate and detailed idea of who that person is.

This has always been worrying for many of us. I was in university at the time that the Guardian and Washington Post started publishing stories based on documents leaked by Edward Snowden. A couple of months before that reporting began, I handed a paper in to one of my professors. The paper was about the mechanisms of online data collection. In it, I observed that if a government organization were collecting the same data that Google does on a regular basis,1 it would be considered outrageous. This, of course, is the scraped intelligence data that I’ve written extensively about.

Yet, over the past three and a half years, the amount of data that technology companies are collecting has skyrocketed with the advent of “Big Data,” virtual assistants, and “internet of things” devices. All of these technologies entered the mainstream well after the Snowden disclosures began, and there’s little sign of slowing down.

As was plainly apparent yesterday, the Democrat-leaning bigger cities of the United States — the technology centres of the country — tend to create a comforting bubble of likemindedness. Even though there have been plenty of concerns raised over data collection, there was perhaps a sense of trust amongst some — and I’m not one of them — that any data scraped by intelligence agencies would be handled with a certain amount of delicacy and responsibility.

I don’t think this is the case any longer.

Statements Trump made while he was a candidate included proposals to create a registry of Muslims living in the United States, deporting all undocumented immigrants, reducing the freedom of the press, and increasing the power of intelligence agencies. Trump has routinely shown himself incapable of keeping a steady hand when situations become stressful. With Republicans2 in charge of all three branches of government, plus a significant number of Democrats who support bulk data collection efforts, the users of many of the largest websites and online services are now facing worrying prospects, particularly those who identify as members of groups that have been targeted by Trump’s proposals.

Technology companies can act. They can step up their encryption efforts before any challenging legislation is proposed. Or, quite simply, they can reduce the amount of data they collect and store. We can help by reducing or eliminating our use of services that insist upon collecting unnecessary user data, or retaining it for long periods of time. It isn’t easy, but it’s responsible.


  1. I used Google as an example in that paper, but the same observation applies equally to a large number of companies↥︎

  2. Including many of the same people who began the NSA’s data collection programs after September 11, 2001, and supported the FBI in their efforts to fight Apple on device encryption. ↥︎

After updating my iPhone to the second developer beta of iOS 10.2 yesterday, I noticed an instructional card that appeared after I popped up the Now Playing screen in Music. This is the same screen that I have previously complained about:

The playback screen is, overall, probably the least-successful element of the redesigned Music app, from a usability perspective. It took me a few days with it before I realized that it was possible to scroll the screen vertically, exposing the shuffle and repeat buttons, adjustable playback queue, and lyrics, when available. There’s simply no visual indicator that it’s possible to scroll this screen.

Adding a popup with instructions on how to use the screen doesn’t actually solve the problem of it not appearing scrollable. There are other ways to resolve this, like making the Now Playing screen bounce slightly when the user taps on it; or, perhaps, cutting off the bottom row of icons very slightly, like the cut-off icons on the right-side edge of a share sheet.

Vindu Goel, New York Times:

Hundreds of fake retail and product apps have popped up in Apple’s App Store in recent weeks — just in time to deceive holiday shoppers.

The counterfeiters have masqueraded as retail chains like Dollar Tree and Foot Locker, big department stores like Dillard’s and Nordstrom, online product bazaars like Zappos.com and Polyvore, and luxury-goods makers like Jimmy Choo, Christian Dior and Salvatore Ferragamo.

Contrary to the article, these apps did not appear “just in time for the holidays” — rather, that’s when the Times and New York Post noticed them. Even though Apple has now removed the apps from the App Store, there’s evidence around the web that these apps have been in the store since mid-September.

Apple gets a lot of App Store submissions, but App Review is supposed to prevent this kind of thing. Even after they scrubbed apps from “Footlocke”, there are still plenty of bogus apps on the store, like this fake SNKRS app.1 As far as I can figure out, the developer of that app as well as “Footlocke” have a bunch of other crapware on the store, and haven’t released anything legitimate. Perhaps apps with names similar to existing apps on the store from otherwise-unknown developers should be subjected to additional scrutiny.


  1. SNKRS is Nike’s app for hot new releases. It isn’t available in Canada, which is why that app caught my eye. Its lack of availability also explains why I’m waiting for a European retailer to ship my Special Field AF-1s. ↥︎

Really interesting article from Ricardo Bilton at Nieman Lab:

Alongside the launch of iOS 10 in September, Apple announced a handful of updates to Apple News, which it launched last fall. Along with some cosmetic changes like a new logo and typeface, the new version of the app brought some much-needed features for publishers, including breaking news notifications and support for paid subscriptions. But for many publishers, the most welcome change was to the traffic it gives publishers, which has grown in a big way.

CNN, for example, says its Apple News content got 36.5 million unique readers in September, a major increase from August’s 5 million. Its pageviews also increased significantly to 274 million, up from 43 million a month before.

Those are some pretty astonishing figures. Other publishers are reporting similarly huge gains, while others are seeing flat traffic. Apple says that News now has 70 million users, which seems pretty good for a news aggregator app only available in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. I have no doubt that the figures are somewhat inflated by this hyperbolic U.S. election season; I’m interested to see how Apple News fares post-election.

Glenn Fleishman, TidBits:

The reason confusion afflicts this space is that a USB-C port on another computer may support just USB, USB plus display and networking protocols, or all of that plus Thunderbolt 3. The 12-inch MacBook’s USB-C port, for instance, natively supports USB 2 and USB 3 along with DisplayPort and, via adapters, VGA, HDMI, and Ethernet connections, but not Thunderbolt 2 or FireWire.

The summary for potential late 2016 MacBook Pro owners is that all current USB-C devices, cables, and adapters should work when plugged into a MacBook Pro’s Thunderbolt 3 ports. However, Thunderbolt 3-specific devices won’t work with computers and other devices like the 12-inch MacBook whose USB-C ports are less capable. Now, let’s drill down into details.

The adapters available for Thunderbolt 3 are also a little confusing. I suspect articles like these are necessary because both the USB and Thunderbolt ports have changed, all in one and at the same time. Also, USB-C is so multipurpose and adaptable that its myriad capabilities can be hard to understand; it isn’t like going from USB 2 to USB 3, where the only incompatibility you’d notice was a reduction in speed.

Sapna Maheshwari and John Herrman, New York Times:

A sample of six Outbrain recommendations on The New Yorker’s website on Oct. 5 showed the confusion readers may face when looking at content ads; several were legitimate, but one led to a spamlike “clickbait” site and another led to a fake health news site created by a marketing company. Two led to editorial stories from AARP, which promotes its website through Outbrain and embeds the widgets on its own site.

[…]

Asked about the widget and about specific ads, Nicholas Thompson, the editor of NewYorker.com, said, “Outbrain only appears on our humor pages. That’s a deliberate choice.” He added that the arrangement was part of a deal between The New Yorker’s parent company, Condé Nast, and Outbrain. Within a week of the interview, The New Yorker had removed the ads from its site, though it declined to comment on its decision.

I’m surprised that a publication as fastidious as the New Yorker ever allowed those kinds of ads on their website in the first place, even in the humour section.

Laura Hazard Owen, Nieman Lab:

Apple added the ability for apps to push rich notifications with the release of iOS 10 in September. This is the first time that the Lab is including iPhones in its experiments, and “the first time we’ve worked on a new notification format that will be available for apps,” said Sarah Schmalbach, the Lab’s senior product manager. The Mobile Innovation Lab collaborated with The Guardian’s U.K. mobile apps development team to incorporate the new format into the paper’s iOS and Android apps. “We shared with them how we built the live data alert format for Chrome web, and also provided the data feed that will power the alerts the night of the election,” Schmalbach said. The team also worked directly with the developer who manages The Guardian’s push notification service, to develop new business rules and ways to deliver data through notifications in real time.

Judging by the screenshot in the article, it looks like the Guardian is going to be showing off the power of iOS 10’s new push notification APIs. This is what the new notifications backend was really designed for: live and breaking events.

Matt Hamblen of Network World:

In late October, market research firm IDC said smartwatch shipments in the third quarter declined by 51% from the same quarter of 2015. The total shipped in the third quarter was 2.7 million, IDC said.

By comparison, research firm Canalys on Thursday said smartwatch shipments were up 60% for the third quarter of 2016 compared with the same quarter a year ago. That resulted in 6.1 million units shipped in the latest quarter, Canalys said.

In other news, I am between six and twelve feet tall, according to analyst estimates.

Mario Aguilar, Gizmodo:

Two early internet pioneers are expressing sadness and disbelief at the fact that Shiva Ayyadurai, a self-described “world-renowned scientist, inventor, lecturer, philanthropist and entrepreneur” who says he invented “email: the electronic mail system as we know it today,” will receive a $750,000 settlement from Gawker Media, the bankrupt publisher that he sued for defamation earlier this year over a series of stories that, his lawsuit claims, “falsely trace the origin of email and call Dr. Ayyadurai a liar.”

Dr. Ayyadurai claimed to have invented email as a teenager in 1978, even though Ray Tomlinson sent the first email in 1971. Gawker Media probably figured it was cheaper to pay out than to continue fighting — something that’s especially important now that they’re bankrupt. Peter Thiel’s crusade against Gawker keeps racking up some pretty ridiculous beneficiaries.

Apple:

We recognize that many users, especially pros, rely on legacy connectors to get work done today and they face a transition. We want to help them move to the latest technology and peripherals, as well as accelerate the growth of this new ecosystem. Through the end of the year, we are reducing prices on all USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 peripherals we sell, as well as the prices on Apple’s USB-C adapters and cables.

The risk Apple faced with moving a professional notebook to a port configuration that exclusively features USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 is that pro users tend to have very specific workflows individually, and completely different workflows in aggregate. That means that the same computer needs to slot into the existing workflows of photographers, video editors, audio engineers, developers, graphic designers, and other professional users. The advantage is that these users all have completely different peripheral requirements, which means that four general-purpose ports with daisy-chaining capabilities ought to make connecting different devices a lot easier. But because USB-C is so new, that could mean buying a bunch of adapters for short-term adjustments.

This conundrum has led to some writers — like Vlad Savov of the Verge — devoting large chunks of their reviews of the new MacBook Pro (sans Touch Bar) to listing the number of adapters they’re looking at buying, along with the price of each. The underlying sentiment in many of these reviews seems to be an implication that Apple is moving to USB-C to get you to spend more money on adapters.

I think that’s ridiculous. I sincerely doubt that they make a tremendous amount of money off adapter sales. But, even if that’s your feeling, this announcement should help calm your worries.

And, yes, that 5K LG display is also discounted, though not yet shipping. What a tease.

A couple of weeks ago, Robert Scoble posted a masterpiece of a claim on Facebook and Medium:

The next iPhone will be, I am told, a clear piece of glass (er, Gorilla Glass sandwich with other polycarbonates for being pretty shatter resistant if dropped) with a next-generation OLED screen (I have several sources confirming this).

[…]

Also, updates from new sources: expect battery and antennas to be hidden around the edges of the screen, which explains how Apple will fit in some of the pieces even while most of the chips that make up a phone are in a pack/strip at the bottom of the phone.

Needless to say, I am hella skeptical of this rumour. I mean, just look at the size of the battery in the iPhone 7 — it’s near the same height as the LCD, and about 60% of the width. I sincerely doubt the release of a transparent iPhone at any point in the foreseeable future.

I figured this rumour would die an easy death because of how ludicrous it is; but, thanks to a recently-published patent and the journalistic fortitude of writers at the Next Web, that hasn’t happened. Bryan Clark:

Adding additional credibility to the scoop, one of Scoble’s fans recently uncovered an Apple patent from 2014 that describes similar technology:

A handheld computing device that includes an enclosure having structural walls formed from a glass material that can be radio-transparent. The enclosure can be formed from a hollow glass tube or two glass members bonded together. A laser frit bonding process may be used to hermetically seal the two glass members together to create a water resistant electronic device.

Will we see a futuristic refresh for the iPhone next year?

Just because something is glass and is radio transparent, that doesn’t mean it’s optically transparent. And, of course, just because Apple files a patent for something, that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s something they’re planning to produce or release.

For what it’s worth, a cursory reading of the patent claims and description indicates that it describes using glass as a critical structural component for a device, and a unique manufacturing process for it. This isn’t a patent for some hyper-futuristic transparent iPhone, and it doesn’t appear to support that rumour in any way.

David Phelan, of the Independent, interviewed Phil Schiller twice after the launch of the new MacBook Pros, and it’s probably one of the best I’ve read recently. Topics covered include the new hardware, the evolution of Apple’s major operating systems, and the reaction to the new MacBooks:

We care about what they love and what they are worried about. And it’s our job to help people through these changes. We know we made good decisions about what to build into the new MacBook Pro and that the result is the best notebook ever made, but it might not be right for everyone on day one. That’s okay, some people felt that way about the first iMac and that turned out pretty good.

I find Schiller’s comparison makes sense: the four Thunderbolt-as-USB-C ports on the new Pro remind me an awful lot of the change to USB on the first iMac. But even that iMac had an Ethernet connection and a phone jack for the modem, in addition to its two USB ports.

The Thunderbolt ports in the new MacBook lineup are, by contrast, much more general-purpose. Because they’re both Thunderbolt and USB-C, you can expect a myriad of useful peripherals — as well as mug warmers and all that other nonsense — in the coming months and years.

For now, though, there’s a good reason that searching sites like NewEgg and Apple’s own store for “USB-C” suggests adapters and cables above everything else. And, because these are “professional” machines that need to fit into a wide array of engrained workflows, you might find yourself needing a lot of adapters at first.

I wanted to highlight one more answer in the interview, in response to a question about the lack of an SD card reader:

One, it’s a bit of a cumbersome slot. You’ve got this thing sticking halfway out. Then there are very fine and fast USB card readers, and then you can use CompactFlash as well as SD. So we could never really resolve this – we picked SD because more consumer cameras have SD but you can only pick one. So, that was a bit of a trade-off. And then more and more cameras are starting to build wireless transfer into the camera. That’s proving very useful. So we think there’s a path forward where you can use a physical adaptor if you want, or do wireless transfer.

This is perhaps the change that frustrates me the most, so I want to pick apart this quote a little.

First, the SD card doesn’t have to stick out. Every camera that I’ve used has a sprung locking mechanism to keep the card snugly in its slot. Something like that might be really elegant on a MacBook Pro, and would help prevent removing the card without ejecting it.

Secondly, CF cards are really only used by some of the highest-end of cameras, like Canon’s 1D X. Other high-end cameras, like Hasselblad’s X1D and the Leica M, use SD cards. Even stepping down to full-frame cameras at a lower price point — the Nikon D810 or the Canon 5D Mk. IV, for instance — also use SD cards. I’m not entirely buying Schiller’s argument that supporting just SD-type cards is a real tradeoff.

As far as wireless transfer is concerned, it’s just not fast or reliable enough, especially for cameras producing 40-plus megabyte RAW images. Want to transfer a thousand of those? Take a nap.

So what are the alternatives? Plugging the camera into the computer means that your camera is out of commission until you can complete the transfer, and it probably also means lugging around a USB-A to USB-C adapter for now. If you’re a photographer, your best bet for transferring images in the field is going to be something like this crummy SD card reader. It’s not pretty and, combined with the lack of a MagSafe connector, looks a little precarious, but it should do the trick. After all, it’s a little tight in there.

Update: Josh Calvetti has reminded me that the original iMac didn’t have FireWire; that wasn’t added until the slot-loading model. I’ve corrected the post.

John Voorhees, MacStories:

Talkshow, which launched about six months ago, will be shutting down effective December 1st. The service allowed groups to have text-based conversations in public.

This seems like the kind of thing Twitter could — and, arguably, should — have built. Talkshow was like Moments, but at a real-time pace.

Apple’s “hobby”, the Apple TV, has always been something of a mixed-bag experiment for the company. It was formally launched alongside the iPhone at Macworld 2007, only to have its UI completely redesigned just a year later, and entirely re-thought as a tiny black box in September 2010.

The latest iteration, the fourth generation model, is the first to have a publicly-accessible API, App Store, and the new trackpad-based remote. In many ways, it’s far more capable than the outgoing models, but it has its drawbacks, starting with that remote. Ken Segall:

The Siri Remote is a gorgeously designed object — it’s just a terribly designed remote.

It’s a thin slab that feels like, well, a thin slab. Its shape doesn’t contribute one iota to ease of use. There are a number of remotes out there that fit the human hand nicely, and put the most-used buttons at one’s fingertips. The Tivo remote is a good example, as are a few presentation clickers.

Lapses of this type make it difficult to defend Apple when it is accused of favoring design over function. It’s hard to think of the Siri Remote as anything but design run amok. It’s beautifully annoying.

Anecdotally, every time I’ve plopped the remote down beside me on the couch, it’s thin and light enough that it will slide next to my thigh at some point and cause whatever I’m watching to jump around.

Despite reported setbacks, Apple is rapidly pushing forward their vision of TV. For a start, I’ve heard that they’re working on an updated remote, and they previewed last week a new app — called simply “TV” — that will launch in December in the United States. John Vorhees, MacStories:

During the event in Cupertino, Apple said that the TV app will recommend content across apps installed on customers’ Apple TVs based on the apps a customer has downloaded as well as media watched, purchased, and rented. TV will also be available on iOS devices, unifying TV and movie watching across iOS and tvOS. In addition, TV will include curated suggestions based on user’s watching habits.

I think this app raises more questions than it answers. For one, why is it an app at all? Joe Rosensteel:

Why is TV the app an app and not the Home screen on the device? It’s obviously modeled after the same ideas that go into other streaming devices that expose content rather than app icons, so why is this a siloed launcher I have to navigate into and out of? Why is this bolted on to the bizarre springboard-like interface of tvOS when it reproduces so much of it?

You could argue that people want to have access to apps that are not for movies or TV shows, but I would suggest that that probably occurs less often and would be satisfied by a button in the TV app that showed you the inane grid of application tiles if you wanted to get at something else.

This was the first thing that sprung to my mind when I was watching the live stream of the event. I understand the familiarity of the app tiles on the existing home screen, but the TV app uses a similar grid of tiles in a more visual interpretation that feels at home on the television.

I get the sense that Apple is in a greater state of flux and transition than it has been for a while. They’ve got two new platforms — tvOS and WatchOS — to work with, a bunch of major hardware changes to the iPhone and MacBook lineups, and a greater reliance upon cloud services than ever before. I’m not sure if there’s actually a greater amount of turbulence than there usually is, but it feels a bit like that.

Amongst a long list of transgressions, the lack of the familiar startup chime in the new MacBook Pros barely registers on my priorities. And I do mean “familiar”. Stephen Hackett:

However, the startup chime is ingrained into the experience of having a Mac, I’m sad to see it go. A Mac without the chime feels broken, even if I know it isn’t. I don’t power down my machines often, but I liked hearing the chime when I power them back up.

It’s tradition.

Whenever I reboot my Mac and I don’t hear the startup chime, I immediately fret that something is broken; usually, though, it’s because I’ve left my system muted.

But my experience with the startup chime is that it’s a greater nuisance than anything. I remember sitting in the library and other quiet study spaces in university, hearing someone power on their Mac, and immediately follow it with a hushed “sorry!” after the sound played.

It’s not exactly a congruous tradeoff, but there are some notable improvements to the power-on behaviour of new Macs. They now switch on when opening the lid, which is what I think most people expect. If you really want to reenable the startup chime, you can, but I’ll be leaving it off whenever I upgrade. Nostalgia doesn’t outweigh the expectation that technology just gets out of the way.