Month: March 2014

On April 8, Windows XP will reach the end of its support life, but it still has a 29% share of the overall operating system market. For comparison, when it reached end of life in June 2010, Windows 2000 had a market share of just 0.75%, and all versions of operating systems which identify as “Linux” had a market share of 1.01% in the same time period, according to NetMarketShare. In fact, Windows XP is still the second most popular version of Windows.

Or, rather, a how-to guide on transferring your Earthlink account to your own custom domain. (Remember Earthlink?)

It’s pretty inexpensive to move to your own domain for your email account. Domain names are around $15; while Joe Kissell recommends easyDNS and Directnic, I prefer Hover. Email services range from free (with Outlook.com and Windows Live Domains) (see update, below) to over a hundred bucks a year, but you’ll probably be fine with Fastmail’s $40 per year plan.

While I don’t necessarily subscribe to the notion that people with Hotmail addresses are viewed more pitifully than Gmail users — at least, among the non-techie crowd — there are so many advantages to controlling your own domain name and email account. Switching email providers without changing addresses is reasonably easy, and it allows for full control over your email setup. Plus, it looks pretty cool.

Update: Apparently Microsoft can sniff through your email account if they feel like it, so I wouldn’t use their services any more.

Suzanne Vranica, Wall Street Journal:

The Samsung stunt didn’t come off without a hitch: many people were quick to note on Twitter that the Oscar host was also tweeting during the evening with rival Apple’s iPhone.

Samsung declined to comment about Ms. DeGeneres’ iPhone usage.

DeGeneres’ personal iPhone reads, to me, like a much more sincere recommendation. It feels almost like a personal recommendation, as it’s the phone she actually uses day-to-day. That goes for Ewan McGregor’s Samsung GS4, too.

It’s not that product placement is in of itself terrible, either. Notice how many Apple products you see in movies, or the cars used in “House of Cards” — these feel organic because they fit into the scene.

This, on the other hand, feels forced.

I’ve been a little quiet lately, working hard on a bunch of other projects. This is one of those projects. It’s called “Gestures”, and it’s a show I curated with new works from six artists:

Gestures investigates the environment of the performance: specifically, the differing but conflated roles of performer and viewer. In these works, the viewers become performers and artists, while the artists become viewers. These pieces invite participation and performance in a public space, allowing each work to unfold and complete itself through engagement and experience.

Last week, I guessed that iOS 7.1 would be shipping this week, but then Mike Beasley poured cold water on that assumption. But today, John Gruber wrote this little nugget:

I’ve heard from a little birdie that the [iTunes Festival] app requires iOS 7.1 (which explains why the app isn’t out yet). That means iOS 7.1 should ship any day now.

I guess I have a rough deadline now.

Zachary M. Seward, Quartz:

The size of GrubHub’s cut varies depending on how much the restaurant is promoted. The prospectus explains, “Restaurants can choose their level of commission rate, at or above the company’s base rates, to affect their relative priority in its sorting algorithms, with restaurants paying higher commission rates generally appearing higher in the search order than restaurants paying lower commission rates.”

Or, as we common folk call it, “bribery”.

Kidding aside, no matter how dirty this feels (and, boy, does it ever feel dirty) this is pretty standard. Looking at reviews or star ratings may not necessarily be good indicators, either, as those who wish to vocalize their complaints tend to dominate reviews. Word of mouth and recommendations from your friends are still your best bet.

On a security-related note, the New York Times’ Jenna Wortham and Nicole Perlroth looked into security breaches at startups:

Before a major breach or hole is discovered, analysts say, tech entrepreneurs take possible security risks as an accepted trade-off for building their product at a rapid pace. Stricter password requirements and airtight encryption take a back seat to user growth, convenience and feature introductions.

I kind of get this excuse, but it’s just that: an excuse. If a developer is collecting personal information, they should own that and accept the responsibilities of protecting it.

Last week, Apple released a white paper with explicit information about the security of the entire iOS stack, including hardware, firmware-level software, and other software on top of that. While I feel it’s a very approachable document for even the moderately technically-inclined, it’s a lot of information.

Happily, a number of writers have begun to distill some of the information within and present it in a much more summarized fashion. Here’s TechCrunch’s Greg Kumparak explaining iMessage’s security:

So if Apple never has your private key, how do messages arrive at all of your devices in a readable form? How do your private key(s) get from one device to the other?

Simple answer: they don’t. You’ve actually got one set of keys for each device you add to iCloud, and each iMessage is encrypted independently for each device. So if you have two devices — say, an iPad and an iPhone — each message sent to you is actually encrypted (AES-128) and stored on Apple’s servers twice. Once for each device. When you pull down a message, it’s specifically encrypted for the device you’re on.

With this in mind, it’s interesting to read QuarksLab’s claims of flaws in iMessage from back in October (or, for the more technically-inclined).

TechCrunch again, but Darrell Etherington this time writing about Touch ID:

The document also includes previously revealed technical data around the Touch ID scanner itself, which takes an 88-by-88-pixel, 500-ppi raster scan of the finger being applied, which is then transmitted to the Secure Enclave, vectorized for the purposes of being analyzed and compared to fingerprints stored in memory, and then discarded. This info, it’s worth recalling, is never transmitted to Apple’s servers, nor is it stored in iCloud or the iTunes backup of a device.

Here’s Rich Mogull from TidBits, on iCloud Keychain:

When passwords are added or changed, Apple syncs only the individual keychain items to other devices that need the update, one at a time. In other words, each keychain item is sent only to each device that needs it, the item is encrypted so only that device can read it, and only one item at a time passes through iCloud.

To read it, an attacker would need to compromise both the key of the receiving device and your iCloud password. Or re-architect the entire process without the user knowing. Even a malicious Apple employee would need to compromise the fundamental architecture of iCloud in multiple locations to access your keychain items surreptitiously.

While I think it’s ill-advised to blindly trust any company, the extent and depth of Apple’s security structure for iOS seems extremely robust. There’s a reason why jailbreaks take forever to create (and, also, why they’re closed as quickly as possible).

Put it this way: Apple doesn’t have a reason to be lax on privacy or security. They earn money by selling physical products and software to customers, not by selling personal information.

Apple has rebranded iOS in the Car as the much more syllable-friendly “CarPlay”, and launched it in Geneva. This new version has a much different interface than that shown at WWDC, as can be seen on the CarPlay page on Apple’s website. Also of note: there are third-party apps which support CarPlay; it isn’t known yet whether third-party developers require a special agreement to enable CarPlay support.

Unlike the iPod support in most cars, which is usually a glorified quarter-inch headphone jack, this is a fully-integrated system. It looks like it’ll be a hell of a lot easier to use than most in-car entertainment systems, too.

Update: MacStories has a video of Volvo’s implementation. While Volvo notes that this is controlled via the touchscreen, note that apps and things can be done via Siri instead, which is probably the less-distracting option.

So I said, in my infinite let’s-call-it wisdom, that next week’s introduction of cars which support iOS in the Car likely means that “iOS 7.1 will drop next week” as well. Of course, Mike Beasley of 9to5Mac poured some cold water on that:

While the update has been in beta for several months and could be released to the public next week, it’s also possible that the auto makers’ announcements will simply be a preview of things to come, with the software continuing to be developed on Apple’s end until a later release.

How about “iOS 7.1 will be out sometime before June”? Does that narrow it down?