Month: February 2021

Joe Morrison (via Om Malik):

It’s hard to knock Big G. They’re still the biggest and best—a Morgan Stanley analyst estimated that Google Maps generated almost $3B in advertising revenue in 2019 alone. But I suspect we’re at the tail end of the golden era for Google Maps. They appear, to me, to be acting from a place of fear and conservatism rather than innovation.

[…]

What gives Google Maps an edge over other experiences? Today, I would argue the three pillars of its comparative advantage are Places, Street View, and 3D data. But in a few years, I think it will mostly just be Places. And shortly thereafter, it may well wind up with no remaining edge beyond convenience and brand loyalty.

Morrison presents a compelling argument that there are now several viable competitors to Google Maps. But, like most things map-related, it is hard to argue that this is globally true. Nearly every competitor cited by Morrison is based in the U.S. — most often in California — with the exception of OpenStreetMap, which is decentralized but was founded in the U.K. My experience with maps from U.S.-based companies is that they are often unreliable elsewhere, even in major cities. That’s not an anti-American knock; it is simply the reality of trying to build geographically-sensitive products elsewhere.

For example, the Chinese company Tencent has comprehensive maps of China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea, but nowhere else. The Russian company Yandex says it has maps of most of the world. But a spot-check of a handful of cities is missing most of the roads in Calgary, Toronto, Portland, Memphis, Osaka, Hyderabad, and Addis Ababa — to name just a few.

I do not think that any single competitor can replace Google Maps worldwide. I do not think that should be the goal, however, especially if we think more in terms of protocols rather than platforms. I like the sound of a more universal maps protocol that makes possible localized tiles and place data, and the nuances that engenders.

Jeff Bezos:

I’m excited to announce that this Q3 I’ll transition to Executive Chair of the Amazon Board and Andy Jassy will become CEO. In the Exec Chair role, I intend to focus my energies and attention on new products and early initiatives. Andy is well known inside the company and has been at Amazon almost as long as I have. He will be an outstanding leader, and he has my full confidence.

Bezos says that he’s not retiring, but is instead “focus[ing] on the Day 1 Fund, the Bezos Earth Fund, Blue Origin, The Washington Post, and my other passions”. The Day One Fund is Bezos’ charitable giving endeavour; the Earth Fund is a $10 billion commitment for climate change research. Blue Origin is space exploration as a private tourist.

This news was delivered concurrent with Amazon’s fourth quarter earnings where it announced by far its best quarter and year in the company’s history. Bezos is stepping out of the CEO role with a net worth of $196 billion, according to Forbes, which increased from $113 billion since April and from $73 billion in 2017. Bezos didn’t even crack the top ten list in 2015.

A dominant story of the last several years — and particularly during this pandemic — is the abhorrent working conditions of Amazon warehouse staff. Tim Bray quit as a result. Amazon used some workers for social media PR. Amazon’s website is full of counterfeits, and what little it does to assist in narrowing down the overwhelming choice is misleading at best and fraudulent at worst, leaving customers in the lurch. Amazon used predatory practices to acquire Diapers.com after which it raised prices for consumers. Just today, Amazon settled with the FTC because it withheld tips from delivery drivers for years.

That whole trickling down of wealth sure appears to be going in an upwards direction.

See Also: Wealth shown as one pixel for every thousand dollars.

Calgary is about to enter a run of very cold days. Not bitterly cold, but much worse than the last two months have offered. This essay struck a different chord than it otherwise might have. I loved it; I think you will.

Juli Clover, MacRumors:

Apple today released the iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5 beta updates for developers, and included in the new software is a feature that’s designed to make it easier to unlock an iPhone while wearing a mask by leveraging the Apple Watch.

An opt-in setting lets you turn on a feature that allows an iPhone to be unlocked with both Face ID and an authenticated Apple Watch combined. You can find this setting by opening up the Settings app, going to the Face ID & Passcode section, entering your passcode, and then toggling on “Unlock with Apple Watch.”

People have been begging for this for the last year but I am not surprised it has taken so long. The security architecture of this must be fascinating. An Apple Watch remains unlocked on your wrist by authenticating with the connected iPhone; now the iPhone is also authenticated by that same Apple Watch. Looks like I picked a bad time to not own a functioning Apple Watch.